diff --git a/docs/source/comparisons_analytical.rst b/docs/source/comparisons_analytical.rst
index 4095f012..35e45640 100644
--- a/docs/source/comparisons_analytical.rst
+++ b/docs/source/comparisons_analytical.rst
@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@ This section presents comparisons between analytical solutions and modelled solu
 Hertzian dipole in free space
 =============================
 
-:download:`hertzian_dipole_fs.in <../../tests/analytical/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs.in>`
+:download:`hertzian_dipole_fs.in <../../tests/models_basic/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs.in>`
 
 This example is of a Hertzian dipole, i.e. an additive source (electric current density), in free space.
 
-.. literalinclude:: ../../tests/analytical/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs.in
+.. literalinclude:: ../../tests/models_basic/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs.in
     :language: none
     :linenos:
 
@@ -24,17 +24,17 @@ Results
 
 .. _hertzian_dipole_fs_results:
 
-.. figure:: ../../tests/analytical/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs_vs_analytical.png
+.. figure:: ../../tests/models_basic/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs_analytical.png
     :width: 600 px
 
     Time history of the electric and magnetic field components of the modelled and analytical solutions.
 
 .. _hertzian_dipole_fs_results_diffs:
 
-.. figure:: ../../tests/analytical/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs_vs_analytical_diffs.png
+.. figure:: ../../tests/models_basic/hertzian_dipole_fs/hertzian_dipole_fs_analytical_diffs.png
     :width: 600 px
 
-    Percentage differences between the modelled and analytical solutions.
+    Percentage differences between the modelled and analytical solutions ('Ref', in this case, indicates solution calculated from theory)
 
 The match between the analytical and numerically modelled solutions is excellent. The maximum difference is approximately 1%, which is observed in the Ez field component (the same direction as the Hertzian dipole source). The other electric field components exhibit maximum differences of approximately 0.5%, and the magnetic field components 0.25%.
 
diff --git a/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst b/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst
index 2c7759a1..454cdc78 100644
--- a/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst
+++ b/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ This example considers the input impedance of a planar bowtie antenna in free sp
 FDTD model
 ^^^^^^^^^^
 
-:download:`antenna_bowtie_fs.in <../../tests/numerical/vs_MoM_MATLAB/antenna_bowtie_fs/antenna_bowtie_fs.in>`
+:download:`antenna_bowtie_fs.in <../../tests/other_codes/vs_MoM_MATLAB/antenna_bowtie_fs/antenna_bowtie_fs.in>`
 
-.. literalinclude:: ../../tests/numerical/vs_MoM_MATLAB/antenna_bowtie_fs/antenna_bowtie_fs.in
+.. literalinclude:: ../../tests/other_codes/vs_MoM_MATLAB/antenna_bowtie_fs/antenna_bowtie_fs.in
     :language: none
     :linenos:
 
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Results
 
 .. _antenna_bowtie_fs_ant_params:
 
-.. figure:: ../../tests/numerical/vs_MoM_MATLAB/antenna_bowtie_fs/antenna_bowtie_fs_ant_params.png
+.. figure:: ../../tests/other_codes/vs_MoM_MATLAB/antenna_bowtie_fs/antenna_bowtie_fs_ant_params.png
     :width: 600 px
 
     Input impedance (resistive and reactive) of a bowtie antenna in free space using FDTD (gprMax) and MoM (MATLAB) models.