From 979c92c9819f4b4c0ccbc9bbc845cad173a0472e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Craig Warren Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:09:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update to figure reference. --- docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst b/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst index 49f705d3..84a63d95 100644 --- a/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst +++ b/docs/source/comparisons_numerical.rst @@ -42,15 +42,13 @@ Results :numref:`antenna_bowtie_fs_ant_params` shows the input impedance (resistive and reactive) for the FDTD (gprMax) and MoM (MATLAB) models. The frequency resolution for the FFT used in both models was :math:`\Delta f = 33.33~MHz` -.. _hertzian_dipole_fs_results: +.. _antenna_bowtie_fs_ant_params: .. figure:: ../../tests/numerical/vs_MoM_MATLAB/antenna_bowtie_fs/antenna_bowtie_fs_ant_params.png :width: 600 px Input impedance (resistive and reactive) of a bowtie antenna in free space using FDTD (gprMax) and MoM (MATLAB) models. -The match between the FDTD and MoM solutions is generally very good. -