Added text describing differences.

docs/source/analytical_comparisons.rst

@@ -15,14 +15,12 @@ This example is of a Hertzian dipole, i.e. an additive source (electric current
     :language: none
     :linenos:
 
-The function ``hertzian_dipole_fs`` in the ``analytical solutions`` module in the ``tests`` sub-package was written to compute the analytical solution.
+The function ``hertzian_dipole_fs``, which can be found in the ``analytical solutions`` module in the ``tests`` sub-package, computes the analytical solution.
-
-.. autofunction:: tests.analytical_solutions.hertzian_dipole_fs
 
 Results
 -------
 
-:numref:`hertzian_dipole_fs_results` shows the time history of the electric and magnetic field components of the modelled and analytical solutions. The responses overlap one another due to their similarity. Therefore, :numref:`hertzian_dipole_fs_results_diffs` shows the percentage differences between the solutions.
+:numref:`hertzian_dipole_fs_results` shows the time history of the electric and magnetic field components of the modelled and analytical solutions. The responses completely overlap one another due to their similarity. Therefore, :numref:`hertzian_dipole_fs_results_diffs` shows the percentage differences between the modelled and analytical solutions.
 
 .. _hertzian_dipole_fs_results:
 
@@ -38,6 +36,8 @@ Results
 
     Percentage differences between the modelled and analytical solutions.
 
+The match between the analytical and numerically modelled solutions is excellent. The maximum difference is approximately 1%, which is observed in the Ez field component (the same direction as the Hertzian dipole source). The other electric field components exhibit maximum differences of approximately 0.5%, and the magnetic field components 0.25%.
+